Akronym by Conjuring Lab

Effect

The audience sees a spectator use their own phone to browse Wikipedia. The spectator clicks links freely. At the end, the magician reveals that the letters from the Wikipedia pages spell out the spectator's name or another chosen word. The effect is a personal and surprising revelation that appears to be a complete coincidence.

Full details

Akronym is a mentalism trick that uses a spectator's smartphone and Wikipedia. No apps, downloads, or setup are needed. The spectator selects a number and then clicks through Wikipedia links. The magician uses that number to determine which letters from the link titles are used. These letters form a word, such as a name or brand. The method is hidden and requires no gimmicks. The trick works in English and French Wikipedia. It needs an internet connection to function.

Who should consider the trick

Professional mentalists performing in corporate settings will find this trick effective. It is also suitable for stage magicians who want a clean, interactive routine. Hobbyists may consider it if the price is acceptable. The trick works with any spectator, even if the magician does not know them beforehand. It is ideal for performers who want a visual and memorable closing effect.

Information on how difficult it is to perform

Akronym is not self-working. It requires practice to perform smoothly. Steve Faulkner notes that performers should avoid rushing through the routine. The method is clean and has no hidden actions, but the procedure must be followed carefully. The trick takes 5 to 10 minutes to perform fully. Performers must manage the spectator's browsing to prevent them from clicking too fast or noticing inconsistencies.

What magicians say

Steve Faulkner says Akronym has a "jaw-dropping impact" and is "versatile for names or other words." He loves its simplicity and accessibility. Magic Orthodoxy focuses on its practicality for real-world performance and spectator impact. Craig from magic-tv appreciates the "clever method" but rates the trick 40%. He says it is "overly procedural" and notes a "risk of audience noticing Wikipedia inconsistencies." AlexisReviews calls it "highly customizable" and "great for mentalism or stage shows." He highlights its "ease of use" and "impressive audience impact." mentalistonashoestring states it is "ideal for professional mentalists" and has a "visual and memorable effect," but the "high price point may deter hobbyists."