Screen Test by Judah Gabriel

Screen Test by Judah Gabriel: A Detailed Analysis

This document provides a comprehensive overview of the “Screen Test” magic trick created by Judah Gabriel, designed to assist magicians in determining its suitability for their performance repertoire.

Effect

The “Screen Test” presents itself as a cleverly disguised book test, cleverly framed as a movie review game. The core of the effect involves a spectator searching for a movie on Google Critics using their own smartphone. The spectator then focuses on a review, identifying the first word of the review. The performer, without ever touching the spectator’s phone, then reveals this word, and subsequently, can reveal further details about the movie, including a drawing duplication of the movie’s poster. The presentation emphasizes the spectator’s phone remains untouched, creating a remarkably clean and deceptive illusion.

Full Details

The “Screen Test” is available through Penguin Magic and operates on an annual subscription model costing $19.99 (approximately $26 Canadian). Judah Gabriel, the creator, provides a detailed one-hour tutorial covering the core routine, as well as supplementary techniques such as forcing movies, peeking information, and expanding performance possibilities. Sebastian toca9208, a reviewer, highlights the accessibility of this subscription model, noting it’s a more sustainable option than purchasing larger, one-time-purchase apps for similar functionality. The effect is versatile, suitable for close-up magic, cabaret performances, stage routines, and even virtual presentations via platforms like Zoom. A stable internet connection is a prerequisite for both the performer and the spectator.

Who Should Consider the Trick

The “Screen Test” is well-suited for magicians who appreciate clean, modern effects with minimal audience interaction. Its versatility allows it to be incorporated into a variety of performance styles. Magicians who enjoy mentalism elements and appreciate a technologically integrated approach will find this effect particularly appealing. Sebastian toca9208 recommends it for magicians seeking an affordable and easily performed effect that generates strong reactions from audiences. The trick’s adaptability to different settings – from intimate close-up performances to larger stage productions – makes it a valuable addition to a magician’s toolkit.

Information on How Difficult It Is to Perform

The “Screen Test” is considered exceptionally easy to perform. It requires no memorization, no physical manipulation of the spectator’s phone, and no reliance on complex techniques. Judah Gabriel emphasizes the importance of guiding the spectator to select a movie that isn’t overly obscure or mainstream, as a large number of reviews could raise suspicion. The routine incorporates elements of a book test, word revelation, and drawing duplication. Sebastian toca9208 notes that the only potential difficulty lies in the drawing component, particularly for magicians who are not skilled artists. However, he suggests that the drawing element can be bypassed if desired, maintaining the effect’s deceptive nature. The effect’s inherent simplicity makes it accessible to magicians of varying skill levels.

What Magicians Say

Sebastian toca9208 provides a highly positive assessment, awarding the effect a rating of 9.75 out of 10. He emphasizes its affordability, ease of performance, and deceptive nature. He acknowledges a minor potential issue with selecting obscure movies, but ultimately considers the effect an exceptional value. He suggests using a movie with a moderate number of reviews to avoid raising suspicion. Sebastian highlights the effect’s potential for repeated use and its ability to generate strong reactions from audiences. Judah Gabriel, in his video review, praises the effect’s cleanliness, affordability, and accessibility, noting the value of the included tutorial and the flexibility of the effect across various performance settings. He also points out a potential issue with selecting overly obscure movies, recommending a balance between obscurity and familiarity.